Clinical Oncology
Volume 20, Issue 8 , Pages 582-590, October 2008

Accuracy and Reproducibility of Conformal Radiotherapy using Data from a Randomised Controlled Trial of Conformal Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer (MRC RT01, ISRCTN47772397)

  • S. Stanley

      Affiliations

    • St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationAuthor for correspondence: S. Stanley, Radiotherapy Department, St James's Institute of Oncology, Bexley Wing, SJUH Leeds, UK. Tel: +113-206-7600.
  • ,
  • S. Griffiths

      Affiliations

    • St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK
  • ,
  • M.R. Sydes

      Affiliations

    • MRC Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK
  • ,
  • A.R. Moore

      Affiliations

    • Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London, UK
  • ,
  • I. Syndikus

      Affiliations

    • Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology, Wirral, UK
  • ,
  • D.P. Dearnaley

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, London, UK
  • ,
  • RT01 Radiographer Trial Implementation Group on behalf of all the RT01 Collaborators

Received 5 March 2007; received in revised form 8 April 2008; accepted 10 April 2008.

Abstract 

Aims

The MRC RT01 trial used conformal radiotherapy to the prostate, a method that reduces the volume of normal tissue treated by 40–50%. Because of the risk of geographical miss, the trial used portal imaging to examine whether treatment delivery was within the required accuracy.

Material and methods

In total, 843 patients were randomly assigned to receive 64Gy in 32 fractions over 6.5 weeks or 74Gy in 37 fractions over 7.5 weeks. Field displacements and corrections were recorded for all imaged fractions. Displacement trends and their association with time, disease and treatment set-up characteristics were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses. A Radiographer Trial Implementation Group (RTIG) was set up to inform the quality assurance process and to promote the development of best practice.

Results

Treatment isocentre positioning was within 5mm in every direction on 6238 (83%) of the 7535 fractions imaged. In total, 532 (81%) of 695 included patients had at least one ≥3mm displacement and 415 (63%) had at least one ≥5mm displacement. Univariate, multivariate and stepwise models of ≥5mm displacements showed an increased likelihood of displacement in weeks 1 and 2 with low melting point alloy (LMPA) blocks compared with multileaf collimators, film verification compared with electronic portal imaging (EPI) and increased number of fractions imaged. Except for LMPA, this was also seen for ≥5mm displacements in weeks 3–6.

Conclusions

Accurate conformal treatment was delivered. The use of EPI was associated with increased reported accuracy. The RTIG was a crucial part of the quality assurance process.

Key words: Conformal radiotherapy, controlled trial, portal imaging, prostate cancer, reproducibility

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0936-6555(08)00253-7

doi:10.1016/j.clon.2008.04.019

Clinical Oncology
Volume 20, Issue 8 , Pages 582-590, October 2008