Clinical Oncology
Volume 21, Issue 3 , Pages 218-225, April 2009

The Utility of Publicly Reported Cancer Treatment Wait Time Information for Patients and Health Care Providers

  • A.C. Whitton

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAuthor for correspondence: A. C. Whitton, Cancer Care Ontario, 620 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2L7, Canada. Tel: +1-416-971-9800; Fax: +1-416-217-1281.
  • ,
  • E. Green

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • W.K. Evans

      Affiliations

    • Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada
  • ,
  • M. Fitch

      Affiliations

    • Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • B. Golden

      Affiliations

    • Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • D. Soman

      Affiliations

    • Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • E. Gutierrez

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • E. Holowaty

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • A.R. Jadad

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, University Health Network & University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Received 20 February 2008; received in revised form 19 November 2008; accepted 10 December 2008.

Abstract 

Aims

To determine the utility of web-based radiation wait time information for patients and health care providers in decision-making. To revise the information using a simulated laboratory environment and to re-evaluate the new web-based information.

Materials and methods

An online ‘pop-up’ survey on the Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) website measured user satisfaction. Qualitative data were gathered through patient focus groups and physician interviews. On the basis of the analysis, the website was revised and usability testing conducted. The information was re-evaluated by end-users through survey methodology.

Results

The majority accessing the wait time website were patients and family members. The modal age of use of the website was 31–50 years. Patients found the information more helpful after redesign than health professionals, but both found the language less easy to understand, highlighting the need to continuously evaluate the effectiveness of the website. Patients did not identify themselves as consumers of wait time information. Their expectation was that physicians would determine the urgency for treatment and would ensure timely access to care. Physicians reported that they did not use the CCO website on wait times and would not use the data for decision-making. Referrals were based on urgency of care and usual referral patterns. Referral patterns did not shift to centres with shorter wait times.

Conclusions

The results of this study did not confirm the usefulness of the web-based wait time information for patients and physicians as a resource on how to obtain timely access to radiation treatment. Patients relied on their physician to manage their access to treatment according to the urgency of their clinical condition. Physicians preferred their established referral process rather than referring their patients to centres with shorter wait times. As patients become more computer savvy, it will be interesting to see if they increasingly become consumers of web-based wait time information.

Key words: Internet, patient decision-making, radiotherapy, waiting times

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0936-6555(08)00492-5

doi:10.1016/j.clon.2008.12.003

Clinical Oncology
Volume 21, Issue 3 , Pages 218-225, April 2009