Clinical Oncology
Volume 22, Issue 2 , Pages 107-113, March 2010

Factors Predicting Outcome for Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer in Elderly Patients Receiving Palliative Chemotherapy

  • S.R. Lord

      Affiliations

    • St James University Hospital, St James Institute of Oncology, Level 4, Bexley Wing, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationAuthor for correspondence. S.R. Lord, c/o Mrs G. Wagner-Adair, Level 4, Bexley Wing, St James University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leads LS9 7TF, UK. Tel: +44-113-2068586; Fax: +44-113-2068474.
  • ,
  • P.S. Hall

      Affiliations

    • University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • ,
  • P. McShane

      Affiliations

    • University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • ,
  • J. Brown

      Affiliations

    • University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • ,
  • M.T. Seymour

      Affiliations

    • St James University Hospital, St James Institute of Oncology, Level 4, Bexley Wing, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK

Received 6 September 2009; received in revised form 3 December 2009; accepted 7 December 2009.

Abstract 

Aims

Most patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer are elderly, but current standard regimens have emerged from trials predominantly involving patients with a median age <65 years. The aim of this study was to assess the factors influencing survival outcome for an elderly gastroesophageal cancer non-trial population.

Materials and methods

We reviewed the case notes of all patients in our centre over the age of 65 years who received palliative chemotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer over a period of 3.5 years. Patients were classified as having received standard, non-standard combination or single-agent chemotherapy. After an initial univariate analysis, a multivariate analysis of the most significant prognostic factors was carried out.

Results

In total, 120 patients were suitable for analysis. The median overall survival for patients receiving standard chemotherapy was 8.1 months, non-standard combination 8.3 months and single-agent fluoropyrimidines 3.9 months. Poor prognosis was predicted by two independent factors: poor performance status (hazard ratio 2.402; 95% confidence interval 1.53–3.77, P<0.001) and the presence of cancer symptoms (hazard ratio 2.235; 95% confidence interval 1.32–3.79, P=0.003).

Conclusions

An assessment of the performance status and the level of symptoms is vital in this vulnerable group of patients. Prospective randomised trials to assess the benefit of chemotherapy in elderly patients with gastroesophageal cancer are required.

Key words: Chemotherapy, elderly, gastric neoplasms, oesophageal neoplasms

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0936-6555(09)00407-5

doi:10.1016/j.clon.2009.12.001

Clinical Oncology
Volume 22, Issue 2 , Pages 107-113, March 2010