Clinical Oncology
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 231-235, April 2010

Life after First-line Chemotherapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: a North-East England Experience

  • J. Steer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UK
  • ,
  • G. Bough

      Affiliations

    • Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle Hospitals Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  • ,
  • A.R.A. Razak

      Affiliations

    • Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle Hospitals Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
    • Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationAuthor for correspondence: A.R.A. Razak, Drug Development Unit, Princess Margaret Hospital, 7-702, 620 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada. Tel: +1-416-500-4011.
  • ,
  • G.J. Meachery

      Affiliations

    • Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UK
  • ,
  • A. Hughes

      Affiliations

    • Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle Hospitals Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Received 9 September 2009; received in revised form 30 December 2009; accepted 29 January 2010.

Abstract 

Aims

The benefit of first-line chemotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has been established. However, this disease invariably progresses and little is known about how this disease subsequently relapses after initial treatment. Data on second-line treatment are also scarce, especially outside the context of a clinical trial. We conducted a review to observe the presentation of MPM patients when their disease progresses after initial therapy and the use of second-line therapy and its associated outcomes.

Materials and methods

Patients were retrospectively identified from the Sunderland Royal Hospital and the Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Data, including demographics, clinical presentation and treatment details at first line and beyond, together with its associated benefits, were collected. Related times to treatment failure (TTF), rates of symptom improvement and survival data were also collated.

Results

There were 62 evaluable patients in our series. At the time of data collection, 58 patients (94%) had relapsed. At disease progression, symptoms were usually similar to those at initial presentation, but in patients with prolonged TTF (>9 months) they were more likely to relapse with clinical lymphadenopathy in the neck and axilla compared with patients with TTF ≤9 months (52% vs 13%, respectively, P<0.05). Second-line treatment was given in 45% of patients. Twenty-one patients (36%) received second-line chemotherapy outside the context of a clinical trial and most had retreatment with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy due to a prolonged TTF. In patients treated with second-line therapy outside the remit of a clinical trial, a disease control rate was achieved in nine patients (43%, 95% confidence interval 22–64), whereas improvement in symptoms were noted in 13 patients (62%, 95% confidence interval 41–83). The median TTF in this setting was 6.5 months.

Conclusion

Patients with a prolonged TTF after first-line treatment are more likely to relapse with neck and axillary lymphadenopathy. The use of second-line chemotherapy, including rechallenge treatment, in this disease is a viable option for a selected group of MPM patients.

Key words: Chemotherapy, mesothelioma, palliative, pemetrexed, radiotherapy, second-line chemotherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0936-6555(10)00046-4

doi:10.1016/j.clon.2010.01.009

Clinical Oncology
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 231-235, April 2010