Clinical Oncology
Volume 22, Issue 6 , Pages 438-447, August 2010

Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer with Rising Thyroglobulin and Negative Diagnostic Radioiodine Whole Body Scan

  • M. Chao

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAuthor for correspondence: M. Chao, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Medical College Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Medical College Qingdao University, Qingdao, China

Received 4 February 2010; accepted 3 May 2010. published online 21 June 2010.

Abstract 

Background

Differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) with rising thyroglobulin (Tg) level and negative radioiodine whole body scan results has been observed in follow-up studies. The management of this condition remains controversial. Most studies support blind 131I treatment while others oppose this approach.

Aims

To assess the effects of 131I therapy for DTC with rising Tg and negative scan results.

Selection criteria

Randomised controlled clinical trials, prospective controlled clinical trials and any trials using 131I treatment or no treatment for Tg-positive and radioiodine-negative disease were included in this review.

Results

Due to the lack of any suitable randomised or prospective controlled trials in this area, it was not possible to undertake a meta-analysis. Eighteen trials were retrieved for further overall assessment. Of 438 patients from 16 studies who were treated empirically with 131I for Tg-positive and radioiodine-negative disease, 267 (62%) displayed pathological uptake in the thyroid bed, lungs, bone, mediastinum and lymph nodes. In studies in which data were available for serum Tg levels during thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression therapy or TSH withdrawal, 188 of 337 patients (56%) showed a decrease in serum Tg. Of 242 patients from five studies who received no specific treatment for Tg-positive and radioiodine-negative disease, 106 (44%) showed spontaneous normalisation and a significant decrease in serum Tg.

Conclusions

The currently available evidence is insufficient for reliable assessment of the potential of 131I treatment for DTC with elevated Tg and negative scan results. A decrease in serum Tg in 62% of patients with DTC with elevated Tg and negative scan results suggests that 131I therapy has a therapeutic effect for more than one-half of patients when the Tg level is considered an index of tumour burden. However, considering that 44% of patients with DTC with elevated Tg and negative scan results showed spontaneous normalisation and a significant reduction in serum Tg without any specific treatment, 131I therapy should be individualised according to clinical characteristics. Other diagnostic techniques are strongly recommended for patients with Tg-positive and radioiodine-negative disease. If these diagnostic results are positive, treatment options such as surgery, external radiotherapy and tumour embolisation should be considered. If diagnostic results are negative, one course of 131I treatment may be considered in high-risk patients with serum Tg >10ng/mL after TSH withdrawal or >5ng/mL under recombinant human TSH stimulation. No further 131I therapy is indicated for patients with a negative post-therapy radioiodine scan.

Key words: Empirical radioiodine therapy, negative diagnostic whole body scan, rising thyroglobulin

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0936-6555(10)00175-5

doi:10.1016/j.clon.2010.05.005

Clinical Oncology
Volume 22, Issue 6 , Pages 438-447, August 2010